1234 Street Name, City Name, United States

(123) 456-7890 info@yourdomain.com

Peer Pressure

slide

Lizard Flanagan, Supermodel??

Format: Paperback

Language: English

Format: PDF / Kindle / ePub

Size: 5.34 MB

Downloadable formats: PDF

He knows better, so why isn't he doing it?" As adults, we provide in-class supports through collaborative teaching and support facilitation. You want to make sure you are putting all your time and effort into strategies that are actually suitable for your child's stage of development. The Environmental Protection Agency recently classified environmental tobacco smoke as a Group A carcinogen, a category that includes asbestos, benzene, and arsenic (19). Like it or not summer is right around the corner... and the age old question is lurking in the back of your mind: "What are we going to do this su For most children, navigating the teen years and the complex and sometimes frustrating social situations of daily life can be particularly difficult.
slide

School Shooter: In His Own Words

Format: Paperback

Language: English

Format: PDF / Kindle / ePub

Size: 5.44 MB

Downloadable formats: PDF

This is probably due to the fact that the family is a much stronger agent of socialization than any individual teacher and also the fact that teachers are not free to voice controversial opinions in most grade and high schools. Once acquired, the concepts of reciprocity, classification, class inclusion, seriation, and number help children to develop a more complete understanding of mathematics and of measurement. We all knew it was wrong but we did it anyways. Finally, findings in a pilot study by a trained observer (Kinsey, 1998) were consistent with the teacher ratings of children within their classrooms.
slide

Morgan Makes Magic

Format: Paperback

Language: English

Format: PDF / Kindle / ePub

Size: 7.98 MB

Downloadable formats: PDF

I was home schooled until the age of 15, thrown into high school with minimal experience writing papers and without having ever taken a test in my life. D�).� Both variables were pretested prior to college entry in 1994 with similar measures. �������� The independent variables derived from the surveys are listed in the Appendix in Table A.� The pre-college data were collected by the freshman survey in 1994.� These measures include the relevant pretest measure for each analysis, gender (female), race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and a measure of academic ability, the student�s SAT score.� Table 1 contains the means and standard deviations. �������� Five friendship group measures were chosen for the model.� Three variables are aggregate measures and include group averages of intellectual self-confidence in 1994, SAT composite scores, and degree aspirations in 1994.� Note that it was necessary to include the corresponding individual-level variables for these measures in the regression model to reduce self-selection effects that confound relationships between group-level measures and the dependent variables (Burstein 1980).� Appropriately, each of the pretest measures, in addition to SAT score, was included in the analysis of both dependent variables. �������� The racial composition of each student�s friendship group was collected with the follow-up survey and used to calculate a measure of the racial diversity of the friendship group.� Racial diversity of the friendship group was measured on a four-point scale.� The degree of racial diversity was defined by the percentage of the largest racial or ethnic group represented in the friendship group: These definitions were applied only to friendship groups consisting of two or more students.��� Note that in the particular sociopolitical context at UCLA, racial diversity was defined by students at the level of ethnicity (Author 1998).� Appropriately, the various Asian American and Latino ethnic groups were not collapsed into broad, singular categories for the purposes of defining racial diversity within friendship groups.� Pan-Asian groups consisting of one Chinese American, one Filipino, and one South Asian student, for example, were not defined as homogeneous but as having no majority racial/ethnic group. �������� The final three variables in the model incorporate one of Weidman�s primary mechanisms of socialization, interaction among students.� A composite variable of three �time diary� items (studying, partying, and talking with students) provides a general measure of student interaction.� Two additional variables measure the frequency of one specific type of interaction hypothesized to be related to both intellectual self-confidence and educational aspirations, having conversations about homework or classwork (with best friends and with other students). �������� The primary set of analyses featured blocked multiple regression procedures to estimate the relationship between the outcome measures and the five friendship group characteristics while holding constant pre-college characteristics and 1994 pretests of intellectual self-confidence and degree aspirations.� Independent variables were entered in three discrete blocks for all equations, in accordance with the college impact and socialization models of Astin (1984, 1993a) and Weidman (1989).� Pre-college characteristics were entered into the regression equation first, followed by the block of friendship group measures and subsequently, the measures of college involvement.� Since preliminary analyses indicated a strong, statistically significant interaction between friendship group diversity and race, separate analyses were conducted for white students (n=151) and students of color [6] (n=285).� Because both individual-level and group-level variables were modeled simultaneously, potential multicollinearity problems in the regression analyses were monitored by reviewing the intercorrelations among independent variables, tolerance indices, and corresponding variance inflation factors [7]. �������� There are a few key limitations that the reader should keep in mind when reviewing the results of this study.� First, the sample drawn for this study represents a single campus with a large enrollment (~36,000), a particularly diverse student body, and other specific characteristics.� It is not known whether the relationships found in this study generalize to other four-year institutions.� An anonymous reviewer familiar with UCLA, for example, noted that a large proportion of third-year students and older live off-campus and therefore may retain off-campus friendships as well.� These non-college reference groups are not considered here and may also be influential.� Second, because freshman survey data were used to generate friendship group measures, the design of the study also did not allow for transfer students as members of students' friendship groups, which may eliminate members of some students' interpersonal environments and bias friendship group measures. �As noted above, freshman data was not available for every best friend named by respondents, which also may introduce error into the calculation of friendship group measures.� Lastly, the single-item measures for degree aspirations and intellectual self-confidence used in this analysis are not easily generalized to higher-order constructs and therefore should be viewed with caution.� �������� Before reporting the results of the multivariate analyses, it is instructive to examine a number of bivariate relationships between the dependent variables and key independent variables.� Table 2 displays distributions of the two dependent variables with two student characteristics, gender and race.� Statistically significant differences were found for intellectual self-confidence.� While a large majority of men (81 percent) rate themselves highly in intellectual self-confidence, a smaller proportion of women (64 percent) rate themselves similarly.� At the lower end of the scale, women are more than twice as likely than men to report themselves among the lowest in terms of intellectual ability, though this difference is not significant at the 0.05 level.� Similarly, white students are much more likely than are students of color to rate themselves highly on intellectual self-confidence.� No significant race or gender differences were found with respect to student�s highest degree aspirations. �������� The major premise of this study is that elements of the interpersonal environment are important influences on socialization in college.� Table 3 provides a simple illustration of the nature of these influences.� For the purposes of comparison, three dichotomous friendship group variables were created.� For both intellectual self-confidence and degree aspirations, friendship groups were classified as �high� or �low,� based upon whether the score for each group measure was above or below the sample mean for each respective variable.� Columns 1 through 4 in Table 3 clearly exhibit the same kind of patterns found among high school students by Epstein (1983).� Students who have best friends with relatively high levels of intellectual self-confidence tend to be more self-confident intellectually after two years of college compared to students with less confident friendship groups.� A similar relationship between individual and group characteristics is evident with respect to degree aspirations.� Interpersonal environments that are high or strong in a particular quality, characteristic, or trait, appear to enhance that same quality among students over time.� Note that these patterns, while compelling, do not take into account entering student characteristics and may mask the effects of self-selection into particular kinds of interpersonal environments (Cohen 1985; LeVine 1966).� �������� The remaining two columns in Table 3 test to see whether a group characteristic other than one directly analogous to the outcome also can be a potentially important socializing influence.� Comparing students with a low level of diversity in their friendship group ("homogeneous" groups) to their counterparts with relatively higher levels ("no majority" groups), we find no statistically significant differences in intellectual self-confidence or degree aspirations.� Some relationship is implied, however, with degree aspirations.� While about 11 percent of students who have diverse friendship groups restrict their educational aspirations to the baccalaureate degree, a larger proportion (18 percent) have similarly low aspirations among students with homogeneous friendship groups. �������� As noted above, preliminary regression analyses of the two outcome measures indicated a statistical interaction between race and diversity of the friendship group.� Figure 1 depicts the interaction graphically.� The graphs below show how diversity in the friendship group essentially has the opposite relationship with intellectual self-confidence and highest degree aspirations for white students and students of color.� For white students, those who have a higher degree of diversity in their friendship group tend to be less self-confident and have lower educational aspirations than do those with homogeneous groups.� For students of color, diversity is associated with enhanced self-confidence and aspirations.� The extent to which these differential patterns persist after taking into account initial differences in the dependent variables is discussed next. �������� Table 4 contains the standardized regression coefficients for the regression models of intellectual self-confidence.� Three regression models each were computed for white students and students of color.� Model 1 coefficients reflect the effects associated with each independent variable after controlling for pre-college characteristics only.� For the variables not in the model, the coefficient each variable would have received if added to Model 1 are also provided in brackets.� Friendship group measures are added in Model 2, providing estimates of their effects independent of each other.� Model 3 coefficients additionally take into account measures of student involvement. �������� Elements of the interpersonal environment of the friendship group exhibit significant relationships with intellectual self-confidence for both white students and students of color.� The effects, however, are quite distinct between the two groups of students.� Among students of color, the group level of intellectual self-confidence has the positive effect consistent with the notion of environmental press; they appear to benefit psychologically from interaction within a highly confident set of best friends.� For white students, a positive influence on intellectual self-confidence appears to emanate more from high group levels of educational aspirations than with high group self-confidence.� The simple correlations indicate that group levels of both intellectual self-confidence and degree aspirations are associated with intellectual self-confidence midway through college.� Controlling for individual-level variables diminishes the association with group intellectual self-confidence (evident by comparison to the bracketed coefficient in model 1), leaving group degree aspirations as the only positive group effect.� Unlike the case of students of color, white students� friendship groups also exhibit negative effects.� The depressive effect of group SAT score is indicative of Davis� (1966) classic relative deprivation interpretation, in which students are likely depressing their self-evaluations in the presence of high-achieving friends. �������� As suggested by figure 1 above, racial and ethnic diversity in the friendship group has a positive effect on intellectual self-confidence for students of color.� Among white students, friendship group diversity is negatively correlated with intellectual self-confidence (partial correlation=-.21, p<.05, after controlling for the pretest only) but fails to gain significance in any of the regression models.� For students of color, a diverse interpersonal environment of friends appears to enhance intellectual self-confidence regardless of the academic ability, educational trajectories, or degree of self-confidence possessed by themselves or by their closest friends.� For white students, friendship group diversity, at best, has no bearing on their intellectual self-confidence.� �������� It is worth noting that the role of SAT scores as a predictive characteristic is markedly different as well for the two groups of students.� At both the individual and group levels, SAT scores are closely associated with white students� sense of their intellectual abilities.� High scores at the individual level enhance self-confidence and as we have seen, group level scores appear to have a relative deprivation type of effect.� The same variables show no effects, positive or negative, among students of color. �������� Lastly, measures of involvement have no significant effect on intellectual self-confidence for either group of students, holding constant pre-college variables and friendship group characteristics. �������� Table 5 tells a similar story with respect to educational aspirations.� Among white students, high aspirations are associated with initially high aspirations as freshmen and by having a highly self-confident friendship group.� Despite a negative value for the bivariate correlation (r = -0.17, p< 0.05), racial diversity in the friendship group again appears to be unrelated to the outcome for white students.� Again, a slightly different pattern of effects is suggested by the data for students of color.� No relationships were found between any of the three academically-oriented friendship group characteristics and educational aspirations among students of color.� Diverse interpersonal environments also appear to have beneficial effects on aspirations, although this relationship should be regarded with caution since the coefficients do not quite reach significance at the conventional 0.05 level and the change in explained variance (adjusted R2) from models 1 to 2 is negligible. �������� In studying the interpersonal environment of the friendship group, I believe this study serves as a meaningful call to re-focus empirical and theoretical treatments of college peer group influence.� The peer group effects found in this study are convincing evidence that the micro-level interpersonal environments of a college campus are important sites of influence on socialization and student development.� The supposition by researchers that interpersonal environments mediate institutional-level peer group effects is strongly supported by this research, and further, the complexity of the findings underscore a need for researchers and administrators to better understand the role of micro-environments in socialization in college. �������� With regard to theory, evidence of both relative deprivation and environmental press was found to operate simultaneously at the interpersonal level.� However, different aspects of the interpersonal environment accounted for each type of influence.� In the analysis of intellectual self-confidence, group SAT scores had a depressive effect while educational aspirations had an enhancing effect.� The inclusion of multiple measures of the interpersonal environment reveals that different but related aspects of the peer environment can have opposite effects.� In addition, these results may explain why previous research has been somewhat inconclusive on this theoretical point.� First, variation of peer effects at the interpersonal level may cancel out overall peer effects at the institutional level and yield no net effect.� This explanation is consistent with Marsh�s (1984) frame of reference interpretation on the effects of ability grouping on the academic self-concept of school children.� Second, reliance on a single aspect of the peer environment at any level may neglect the effects of other peer characteristics and essentially reveals only one of many distinct yet interrelated processes.� Marsh (1991) demonstrated this point within a high school context where he found school-average SES and school-average ability to have opposite effects on both educational aspirations and academic self-concept. �He speculated that the positive effects of school-average SES were due to group identification processes while the negative effects of school-average ability were the result of social comparison (relative deprivation) processes.� The results of the current study suggest that both types of processes operate at the interpersonal level.� It is important to note that these opposing peer effects were found for the white student sample only.� Evidence of relative deprivation in the interpersonal context was not found among students of color, and the extent to which this conclusion applies across race is unknown.� Finally, while the current study does not make an attempt to compare the relative influence of membership groups (best friends) to reference groups (the campus peer group), the variation of effects found within the white student sample and between white students and students of color suggests that membership groups may not merely mediate campus peer influence, they may serve to isolate members from more distal institutional influences as well.� �������� These findings, coupled with the positive effects of racial diversity evident for students of color only, suggest that the peer factors that influence students� intellectual self-confidence and degree aspirations operate differentially by race.� In their comprehensive study of self-concept development among college students, Pascarella, Smart, Ethington, and Nettles (1987) found few racial differences among factors influencing self-concept.� The few differences found by the researchers were in the differential impact of various behavioral activities while in college by white and black students.� Furthermore, they noted that there were no patterns in these differential effects by race.� The variations found between white students and students of color in this study suggest that the factors which produce differential patterns of effects on self-concept may originate in the frequently unmeasured interpersonal environment of students. �������� The methodological focus of this study validates the applicability and feasibility of conducting quantitative, longitudinal studies of the interpersonal environment on large, sociologically complex campuses.� Studies of the influence of friends are typically limited by cross-sectional designs and/or simultaneous measurement of student and friendship group characteristics (Cohen 1983).� In taking advantage of a national freshman survey administered prior to college (during orientation), I have been able to avoid many of such inferentially confounding pitfalls for most group measures.� Most significantly, with the use of student-defined friendship group measures, we are assured of capturing actual environments of interaction, and consequently, more accurately assessing the impact of the environment. �������� The results also raise interesting questions with regard to diversity.� The assessment of the influence of racial diversity in the interpersonal environment showed that diversity is an important peer characteristic to consider along with traditional measures of peer ability and self-concept.� A previous study showed that racial diversity in the friendship group is important for increasing a student�s commitment to racial understanding and is associated with interracial interaction outside of the friendship group (Author 1998).� The present study indicates that racial diversity is also important when examining academically related cognitive outcomes.� While it is important to recognize that diversity does have an effect on academically oriented outcomes, what is missing from this discussion is a theory of how diversity operates in the context of academics.� In the case of interracial interaction and racial understanding, the mechanism appears to be the exposure and dealing with issues of racism, discrimination, and cultural difference (Author 1998).� The connection that interracial interaction and friendships has to academic outcomes is less clear. �������� The positive effect of friendship group diversity on intellectual self-confidence and (more tentatively) educational aspirations was found for students of color only, and the absence of a similar effect among white students can help us think about the relationship between diverse friendships and academic outcomes.� In the realm of self-concept and aspirations, diversity may simply provide students � students of color � a normative context which contains more varied reference points from which to evaluate themselves.� Under this interpretation, diversity in the friendship group presents students with multiple referents with respect to academic ability, and the presence and tacit acceptance of cultural diversity supports the legitimacy of adhering to multiple norms while remaining a cohesive group.� The standard deviation in SAT scores among best friends who are members of the more homogenous friendship groups (s=121), for example, is smaller than among best friends in the more diverse groups (s=131) in this sample.� Alternatively, a racially diverse comparative context may reduce a devaluation of ability among students of color due to �stereotype threat� (Steele 1997) that may be triggered in predominantly white settings and in this manner, function to enhance self-esteem.� In this interpretation, racially diverse friendship groups act as enclaves of safety against threats to self-esteem in the greater environment.� Finally, perhaps there is simply an environmental press effect for students of color because they are validated by interacting closely with non-white students with high (relative to stereotypical assumptions) aspirations and competencies.� The combination of this validation with the re-framing of their psyche in a non-white frame may make group diversity as influential, and in some cases, more influential than academic competencies or self-esteem in the group, as the findings indicate. �������� The results for white students also raise questions and suggest directions for future study.� Are white students� academic self-beliefs and aspirations unaffected by racial diversity?� Results of the current study imply that racial diversity is not a salient environmental characteristic in academic domains for white students.� In fact, the data suggest a negative effect for diversity on intellectual self-confidence.� This result contradicts the findings of Chang (1996) who found interracial interaction among white students to enhance intellectual self-concept.� These discrepant findings indicate a need to probe deeper into the friendship groups of white students and understand the differences in interaction within racially diverse groups compared to more homogeneous ones.� The differences may lay in the nature and quality of relationships among best friends in different types of friendship groups.� For example, Author (1998) found descriptions of mutual trust and emotional closeness within friendship groups to be more common among students with more homogenous friendship groups than those with relatively diverse groups.�� �������� � Finally, why do white students appear more susceptible to the effects of relative deprivation on intellectual self-confidence than do students of color?� The differential effects of SAT scores at both the individual and group levels suggest that SAT scores may carry heavier psychological weight for constructing self-concept among white students as compared to students of color.� At the group level, it is difficult to exactly determine what group average SAT scores represent.� For white students, higher group SAT scores may be a measure of academic ability, competitiveness, or perhaps, academic stress.� Future research that �unpacks� the operational meaning of this classic peer measure in the context of the friendship group will help us to further understand the mechanism of relative deprivation and the differential effects observed in this study.
slide

Cure for the Meanies (Pictureback(R))

Format: Paperback

Language: English

Format: PDF / Kindle / ePub

Size: 14.21 MB

Downloadable formats: PDF

Teach your child it is ok to say “no” and to stand up for what they believe in. And individual factors include early problem behavior, impulsiveness or low levels of self-control, rebellious attitudes, beliefs favoring law violation, and low levels of social competency skills such as identifying likely consequences of actions and alternative solutions to problems, taking the perspective of others, and correctly interpreting social cues.
slide

BMX Breakthrough (Sports Illustrated Kids Graphic Novels)

Format: Paperback

Language: English

Format: PDF / Kindle / ePub

Size: 5.16 MB

Downloadable formats: PDF

However, you can reduce the influence that peer pressure has on your teenagers by making the following moves: Open lines of communication: It is vital that you be understanding and approachable. Leadbeater. "The Effects of Family, School, and Classroom Ecologies on Changes in Children's Social Competence and Emotional and Behavioral Problems in First Grade." This teaching requires attention, focus, and motivation from the primary caregiver.
slide

Miracle Girls: A Novel

Format: Print Length

Language: English

Format: PDF / Kindle / ePub

Size: 6.64 MB

Downloadable formats: PDF

What Isobel's teacher and parents did not know was that by reading and discussing stories with her and by encouraging Isobel to share her school experiences in Spanish, they were giving her experiences in their native language. It is common for teens to occasionally feel unhappy. They assist other seniors who are feeling lost or isolated, depressed, or lonely as a result of their living situation, family circumstances, bereavement, or health concerns. A number of factors contribute to the drop in confidence during middle childhood.
slide

Mission Impossible (Northern Lights Young Novels)

Format: Paperback

Language: English

Format: PDF / Kindle / ePub

Size: 10.41 MB

Downloadable formats: PDF

To the parent looking for social activities for a freshman son ... you didn't say where he goes to school ... Without specialized help with these skills, even the brightest teenager may end up unable to make and keep friends or hold down a job. This stark reality points to the importance of social skills acquisition across environments, especially for our children for whom these skills present a particular challenge.
slide

The Skin I Am in

Format: Paperback

Language: English

Format: PDF / Kindle / ePub

Size: 6.90 MB

Downloadable formats: PDF

There are two major problems that make most socialization research, including the attachment literature, difficult to interpret. This was mainly because, as discussed by Kavale and Mostert, most of the programs were developed by the researchers, and were not based on a sound conceptual framework of social skills or social competence. Howes’ (1983) research suggests that there are distinctive patterns of friendship for the infant, toddler, and preschooler age groups. Even when two languages are acquired simultaneously, from two different caregivers or in two different contexts, children seldom intermix them unless they hear others doing so ( Genesee, 1989; Lanza, 1992 ).
slide

Gangs: Deal with it before wrong seems right (Lorimer Deal

Format: Library Binding

Language: English

Format: PDF / Kindle / ePub

Size: 8.39 MB

Downloadable formats: PDF

I trusted the first one to a very conservative college and visited on weekends but the progressive onslaught is too much for any one. Help children to learn appropriate social skills, It will help them grow as good human beings Create a culture that fosters good social skills. E.), and Gang Resistance Education and Training (G. Peer pressure is the tendency to join the bandwagon; you lose your originality of thought and conduct. High school counselor gives information about the Turkish University Entrance System (ÖSYS) to the students and parents through seminars and individual meetings. “College Nights” is one of these informative meetings organized in the fall and spring semesters.
slide

Saving Montgomery Sole

Format: Print Length

Language: English

Format: PDF / Kindle / ePub

Size: 14.59 MB

Downloadable formats: PDF

Negative peer pressure can wreak havoc in the life of any individual. Play styles in early childhood: Consequences for boys and girls. There are, however, two potentially inappropriate parts of the film that I think you should know about. Adolescence is an age when teenagers try to create an identity for themselves. Children view both sadness and anger as occurring when a desired goal is lost or not attained. The third step is to find fun ways for your child to rehearse the skill until he can finally use it without adult guidance.